Leeds woodworm infestation is really just Bark Borer–see?

Woodworm is a generic term and can mean any insect that leaves holes in wood. However, it is usually applied to the Common Furniture Beetle Anobium punctatum, which can cause serious structural damage.  I’ve mentioned that other species are commonly misdiagnoses as ‘woodworm’, sometimes with unnecessary anxiety and even wasted treatment costs.

Last week I was in a roof void in Horsforth, carrying out a pre-purchase timber survey for a client. The obvious infestation in some of the roof timbers had already been noted and I thought I’d pop something up on the blog for those who are not familiar with The Bark Borer Beetle Ernobius mollis.

This insect shares many of Common Furniture Beetle’s visual’s such as similar exit hole diameter and even the adults look similar.

Anyway, the video below tells the story and I’ve also taken a close-up macro shot of the frass for you.

Woodworm, but not as we know it.

 

Here’s the macro image I promised you.  Note the pellets reflect the food – almost black through to buff colour.

Bark Borer Beetle frass sample from Leeds, West yorkshire

I have come across treatment guarantees for work done in roof voids, where this was the only infestation, so it does pay to get diagnosis right. Any self respecting timber surveyor with CSRT will have had to demonstrate his ability to identify these common insect species, but there are many untrained ‘specialists’ and some building surveyors who don’t always get this right.

Remember, the bark may be missing, leaving the tunnels and some exit holes clearly visible.

 

Dry Rot

Comments

  1. Akash Luth says:

    Brilliant mate, very helpful to see them in action. The bark should really be stripped before construction of the property.

    Thanks

Speak Your Mind

*

Copyright © 2010 Preservation Expert. Legal Stuff: All the advice and information in the posts on my blog is made in good faith and is based on my experience and knowledge at the time of writing. However, nobody is infallible and whilst I’m confident that most of what I write about preservation issues is accurate, there’s a good chance there’ll be an error or two somewhere. I do change my mind about stuff, as I gain more experience. In view of this you must make your own decisions on whether to follow any advice I write and think about this; I could be wrong. No responsibility will be accepted by the author for any losses anyone may suffer as a result of any mistake or for the consequence of any action you take as a result of reading this blog. If you do suffer a loss, resulting from anything I’ve written, a verbal heartfelt apology will be your only compensation.